Content wire does not have the resources to verify that companies stick to their statements when reproducing facts from press releases, but reader's feedback is vital to get the full picture.
4 June 2001, 11 am GMT
Last week we received from a reader an email message:
I take exception to the press release from ContentGuard that was posted to your site today, Thursday 31 May.
I am a former Digital Goods content provider who was contacted by a ContentGuard sales rep. I was assured that I would be up and running in "less than two weeks."
ContentGuard advised me that I would be able to load my content today, a little over two weeks after I signed a contract. However, this morning I received an e-mail from ContentGuard advising me that there were problems with the system that would cause delays. This is hardly what I would call an "implemented" system their press
release implied. My date to upload content was slipped to an unspecified date.
A visit to the eContentSeller site in the past hour shows a "Coming Soon" message, but no content for sale.
Just because ContentGuard says it's so doesn't make it true.
The question is easy: "Why isn't the eContentSeller.com site live in light of the press release?"
(Signed, received via e-mail)
Content-wire takes readers comments seriously.
What about ContentGuard?

Comments
Post new comment